|
|
Post by gftlwx on Dec 11, 2017 12:05:19 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by hlsto2 on Dec 11, 2017 19:55:48 GMT -5
you can tell these manuals are written by non-observers. why not just change the contraction for snow pellets to SP?  would save a lot of work or...just no remark for hail less than 1/4" GR with no remark = hail less than 1/4" in diameter. |
|
|
|
Post by skobie on Dec 12, 2017 13:34:51 GMT -5
I know one thing....the 7900 is going to have a hard time catching up to the FMH, considering the writers of that manual seem to ignore repeated requests for obvious and needed changes. Now they're going to have to work double-time, which should only take about 4 more revisions and give or take 10 years!
skobie
|
|
|
|
Post by hlsto2 on Dec 12, 2017 13:42:54 GMT -5
7900...what you get when you have people trained to talk to pilots writing the manual. 7900 will never catch up. it's always been a mess and always will be. they ask for comments on proposed manuals...we send them...they ignore them. then we have these sling psychrometers...
|
|
|
|
Post by northwx on Dec 13, 2017 18:34:33 GMT -5
Policy writers don't talk to pilots either (at least they haven't in so long they've forgotten) - nor do they have windows in their cubicles or ever fly in airplanes... Sorry, this sounds more cynical than meant...
|
|
