|
Post by TCU 2U2 on Feb 10, 2016 17:05:43 GMT -5
Operations:
The FY 2017 President’s Budget is requesting $10.0 billion for the operation, maintenance, communications, and logistical support of the air traffic control and air navigation systems. This represents an increase of 1 percent above the FY 2016 enacted level to accommodate uncontrollable pay and inflationary increases, transition from F&E of maintenance costs for new equipment, and discretionary increases.
Offsetting these increases are $47 million in cost savings achieved through the Contract Weather program, Lean Maintenance, and other administrative efficiencies.
From the Avweb story:
An FAA spokeswoman told AVweb that controllers already provide weather observation services at 75 percent of the nation's control towers. The annual cost to operate the 57 CWO sites is about $20 million, and any cost reductions would depend on how the changes are implemented, as observers could be contractors, controllers or non-federal employees. "Cost savings are not the driving force behind this proposed change," the agency said in an email response. "Periodically, the FAA conducts a review to determine if controllers can perform these functions at additional locations to ensure the best use of our fiscal resources. The FAA is conducting Safety Risk Management Panels to evaluate proposed changes for determining which human weather observer could be used."
|
|
|
Post by snowwx on Feb 11, 2016 2:50:32 GMT -5
$20 million is so dead wrong...That would come to about $350,000 per site...NOT EVEN ClOSE!! Our office doesnt even get to 190 per year for all expenses and 7 people...3 full time and 4 part time...Closing our office doesnt even get the ATC sups pay... Coverting CWOs to LAWRS will ,in the long term , will cost the FAA 3-4x what they are paying now...they are cutting off their nose despite their face. Idiots!!
|
|
|
Post by toofarnorth on Feb 11, 2016 15:07:17 GMT -5
A lot of their "costs" in operating CWOs is their own admin costs - at least 40% of the quoted cost of running our station is the utilities used by transient FAA maintenance staff who live downstairs in our building plus admin in DC... Their idea of "cost" saving is worse than a joke - the collusion with NATCA shows who benefits, and it's not the FAA or the American people.
|
|
|
Post by toofarnorth on Mar 3, 2016 14:40:56 GMT -5
For all of us in Alaska who think that our sites are "safe": I heard from our assigned FAA maintenance tech that our airport (and all the AK airports that have CWOs except JNU, FAI, and ANC) is scheduled to have all the NAV aids turned off - including the runway lights - and downgrading the airport classification. This will eliminate the CWO and our jobs. Backdoor approach without even the kangaroo SRMP. Guess they want to kill all of Alaska - we are super dependent on aviation. Do less with more... FAA mantra. Guess Huerta wants more than a 1% pay raise - at safety and our expense.
|
|