|
|
Post by TCU 2U2 on Apr 15, 2013 11:05:18 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by tornado on Apr 15, 2013 11:12:05 GMT -5
Good link, TCU 2U2! What do you think, should we all call that number listed?
Democratic Press Office - (202) 224-8374
|
|
|
|
Post by tornado on Apr 15, 2013 11:23:56 GMT -5
I called that number, and the Democratic Press Office gave me another number (202)224-9000. The page working that line told me to e-mail my concerns to the Legislative Assistant, Taylor Woods, at taylor_woods@commerce.senate.gov |
|
|
|
Post by TCU 2U2 on Apr 15, 2013 11:58:41 GMT -5
My letter just got kicked back when sending to Taylor.woods ... try Taylor_woods ... so far it has not come back as a failed send
|
|
|
|
Post by tornado on Apr 15, 2013 12:24:09 GMT -5
Fixed e-mail link, thanks TCU.
|
|
|
|
Post by chachiman on Apr 15, 2013 12:35:23 GMT -5
The Staffer I talked to this morning was Tyler Roth. He is on the staff of John D. Rockefeller. He shared with me a way for us to get through to them to talk to the FAA about us would be to send a Statement of Record after the meeting has been held. We should only do that if they fail to bring any plans for us up in this meeting. If they fail to mention us, he said to send a Statement of Record directly to him at Tyler_Roth@commerce.senate.gov
|
|
|
|
Post by swifterz on Apr 15, 2013 16:28:26 GMT -5
The Staffer I talked to this morning was Tyler Roth. He is on the staff of John D. Rockefeller. He shared with me a way for us to get through to them to talk to the FAA about us would be to send a Statement of Record after the meeting has been held. We should only do that if they fail to bring any plans for us up in this meeting. If they fail to mention us, he said to send a Statement of Record directly to him at Tyler_Roth@commerce.senate.gov Great work on that front  |
|
|
|
Post by snowspinner on Apr 15, 2013 16:35:21 GMT -5
Thank you for all of your hard work! |
|
|
|
Post by nimbus9 on Apr 15, 2013 16:40:32 GMT -5
Yes, THANK YOU all for your tireless efforts to preserve the CWO program, our jobs and air safety.
|
|
|
|
Post by snowspinner on Apr 15, 2013 19:18:57 GMT -5
Do you think we'll find something out tomorrow?
|
|
|
|
Post by sluroots on Apr 15, 2013 19:39:13 GMT -5
Do you think we'll find something out tomorrow? Find something definite out? I don't think so. I do think we'll be able to decipher through the political talk and somewhat figure out the FAA's plans regarding the sequestration and safety. I also think we'll all be able to confirm that there is going to be a lot of hot air blown at the committee stating no "degradation of service" from the FAA, that I am sure will get all of us even more pissed off. It's primarily going to be related to the control towers, just hoping that we get mentioned, especially in a positive "we are a vital to NAS" type of discussion. We shall see. On a related note, does anyone know if this is on CSPAN by any chance? Or is it just streamed online? |
|
|
|
Post by swifterz on Apr 16, 2013 9:21:47 GMT -5
On a related note, does anyone know if this is on CSPAN by any chance? Or is it just streamed online? The link to the webcast is in TCU's first post. |
|
|
|
Post by kukblue1 on Apr 16, 2013 14:38:09 GMT -5
If safety is the number one priority wouldn't weather observers be like the most important group behind the actually tower personal??
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 16, 2013 14:43:24 GMT -5
Apparently not, so far there's been no mention of CWO's. Just towers, towers, towers.
|
|
|
|
Post by swifterz on Apr 16, 2013 14:47:27 GMT -5
Apparently not, so far there's been no mention of CWO's. Just towers, towers, towers. With weather a concern from some of the Congressmen as well. But yes, all towers, towers, towers and ones in my state seem to be their concern. |
|
